In the contemporary world, there are about four types of products known as ceramic plates: porcelain plates, enamel or ceramic plates, light plates, and ceramic plates. The first two have a thickness of 3 to 6 mm, and the latter two have a thickness of 10 mm to 20 mm. The four products of the plate are divided from the ceramic tile series, and the distinction between the brick products and the brick products has two basic points: 1. Larger than the size of the bricks (China's existing standards stipulate that any single side length is not less than 900 mm. Not less than 1.62 square meters); 2. The board is used as a material, such as triple wood board, metal board, gypsum board, etc.
I was the first person to put forward this idea or idea and did a lot of practical work for it. However, I am not an entrepreneur. Why did I call for insisting on the separation of bricks and plates for so many years? The reason is to leave a new development space for the future of Chinese architectural ceramics, and at the same time make the products use reasonably. There are thousands of years of human history in making bricks. The annual output of China Brick Modern is close to 10 billion square meters, and the production technology and equipment are relatively mature. Why can't we explore and develop the material? Moreover, new materials are an important part of the national development plan. There may be an end to making bricks, and the material is endless.
Some people in the industry are now trying hard to describe thin bricks with dimensions of 600 x 1200 (millimeters) as ceramic plates. This group of people devalued the ceramic plate, and on the other side they wanted to rely on their own products. If not, they would say that the standard was arbitrary and unreasonable, and that it was necessary to revise and remove what was going abroad. I simply conjecture from his remarks whether these people proposed that the company’s existing process technology or equipment conditions would not be able to meet the standard definition of the product at the moment but would like to squeeze it into the sheet series. If so, hope that these people will either put forward more scientific reasons or accept the standards first and implement them. After all, the standards are revised on a regular basis. Moreover, the current national standards for ceramic plates are set by the standard committee.
Large-size new lightweight panels do not yet have industrial product standards and applied technical planning industry standards, which greatly restricts the design and selection. However, this new product is the best embodiment of circular economy, and the entire industry should unite to promote the industry standard. The formulation.
The annual sales volume of Chinese ceramic thin plates and lightweight (thick) plates has not exceeded 10 million square meters, which is negligible compared to the annual sales volume of traditional bricks exceeding 6 billion square meters. On the one hand, it is said that the plate is a good thing in saving resources. On the other hand, there is no real action. Why did the industry seriously study and discuss? With the changes in the social development environment, I still insist and predict that ceramic plates will eventually become popular in China.
I was the first person to put forward this idea or idea and did a lot of practical work for it. However, I am not an entrepreneur. Why did I call for insisting on the separation of bricks and plates for so many years? The reason is to leave a new development space for the future of Chinese architectural ceramics, and at the same time make the products use reasonably. There are thousands of years of human history in making bricks. The annual output of China Brick Modern is close to 10 billion square meters, and the production technology and equipment are relatively mature. Why can't we explore and develop the material? Moreover, new materials are an important part of the national development plan. There may be an end to making bricks, and the material is endless.
Some people in the industry are now trying hard to describe thin bricks with dimensions of 600 x 1200 (millimeters) as ceramic plates. This group of people devalued the ceramic plate, and on the other side they wanted to rely on their own products. If not, they would say that the standard was arbitrary and unreasonable, and that it was necessary to revise and remove what was going abroad. I simply conjecture from his remarks whether these people proposed that the company’s existing process technology or equipment conditions would not be able to meet the standard definition of the product at the moment but would like to squeeze it into the sheet series. If so, hope that these people will either put forward more scientific reasons or accept the standards first and implement them. After all, the standards are revised on a regular basis. Moreover, the current national standards for ceramic plates are set by the standard committee.
Large-size new lightweight panels do not yet have industrial product standards and applied technical planning industry standards, which greatly restricts the design and selection. However, this new product is the best embodiment of circular economy, and the entire industry should unite to promote the industry standard. The formulation.
The annual sales volume of Chinese ceramic thin plates and lightweight (thick) plates has not exceeded 10 million square meters, which is negligible compared to the annual sales volume of traditional bricks exceeding 6 billion square meters. On the one hand, it is said that the plate is a good thing in saving resources. On the other hand, there is no real action. Why did the industry seriously study and discuss? With the changes in the social development environment, I still insist and predict that ceramic plates will eventually become popular in China.
Indoor Floor Mats Carpets,Hotel Carpet Flooring,Sittingroom Carpet
Printed Carpet Co., Ltd. , http://www.hot-carpets.com